![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
|
Home > Ratification of the Constitution > Elliot's Debates > Volume 5 > Debates in the Congress of the Confederation, from November 4, 1782, to June 21, 1783; and from February 19 to April 25, 1787.
The reappointment of Mr. Jefferson, as minister plenipotentiary for negotiating peace, was agreed to unanimously, and without a single adverse remark. The act took place in consequence of its being suggested, that the death of Mrs. Jefferson had probably changed the sentiments of Mr. Jefferson with regard to public life; and that all the reasons which led to his original appointment still existed, and, indeed, had acquired additional force from the improbability that Mr. Laurens would actually assist in the negotiation. "A motion was made by Mr. RUTLEDGE, declaring that when a matter was referred to any of the departments to take order, it was the sense and meaning of Congress that the same should be carried into execution." On this motion some argued that such reference amounted to an absolute injunction; ethers insisted that it gave authority, but did not absolutely exclude discretion in the executive departments. The explanation that was finally acquiesced in, as most rational and conformable to practice, was, that it not only gave authority, but expressed the sense of Congress that the measure ought to be executed; leaving it so far, however, in the discretion of the executive department, as that, in case it differed in opinion from Congress, it might suspend execution, and state the objections to Congress, that their final direction might be given. In the course of debate it was observed, by Mr. MADISON, that the practice of referring matters to take order, especially where money was to be issued, was extremely exceptionable, inasmuch as no entry of such proceedings was made on the journals, but only noted in a memorandum book kept by the secretary, and then sent to the department, with the reference to take order endorsed by the secretary, but not signed by him; so that the transaction, even where public in its nature, never came before the public eye, and the department was left with a precarious voucher for its justification. The motion was, in the end, withdrawn; the mover alleging that, as he only aimed at rendering an uncertain point clear, and this had been brought about by a satisfactory explanation, he did not wish for any resolution on the subject.
|
||||||||||
| Master of American History and Government: | Home | About | Admission | Schedule of Courses | Course Registration | Tuition | Faculty | Request More Information |
||||||
| Free Saturday Seminars for Teachers: | Upcoming Saturday Seminars | Register Online | Previous Seminars | ||||||
| Free Summer Institutes for Teachers: | Upcoming Summer Institutes | Previous Institutes | ||||||
| Historical Documents Library: | Home | Founding
Era | Expansion Era | Civil
War Era | Progressive Era Post World War II Era | General Resources |
||||||
| Online Audio Lectures and Discussions: | Home | ||||||
| Special Exhibits: | Constitutional Convention | Ratification of the Constitution | ||||||
| Teaching American History Grants: | Partner with the Ashbrook Center | TAH Grant Web Sites | Ashbrook Center TAH Grant Partners |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Support for teachingamericanhistory.org is provided by the Verizon Foundation. |
|
A Project of the Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs at Ashland University 401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805 (419) 289-5411 | (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free) info@TeachingAmericanHistory.org © 2006 Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs |